Over 90 days ago, the Pac-12 bid farewell to its football legacy with a thrilling championship showdown between #5 Oregon and #3 Washington, marking the end of an era in college football. The event drew record-breaking viewership, with over nine million tuning in to witness Washington emerge victorious, eventually making their way to the national championship. However, as the dust settled on the gridiron glory, attention turned to the basketball court, where a striking lack of buzz surrounds the final days of Pac-12 basketball.

The sharp contrast between the excitement of football and the subdued atmosphere of basketball begs the question: why such a disparity? The answer lies in the Pac-12’s football dominance compared to its basketball landscape. In the football realm, the conference showcased unparalleled talent from top to bottom, defying expectations with multiple teams ranked among the nation’s best. This unexpected surge in football prowess challenged the conference’s previous reputation as a non-entity in the title race, ultimately reinvigorating interest in Pac-12 football.

Photo Cred: Arizona State

On the flip side, Pac-12 basketball fails to elicit the same level of national relevance, with only a handful of teams making a mark on the court. Unlike football, where several teams vied for top rankings, the basketball scene is dominated by Arizona, Washington State, and a host of mediocrity among the remaining teams. With only these two teams securing safe positions heading into the conference tournaments, and a couple more teetering on the bubble, concerns mount over the quiet demise of Pac-12 basketball, contrasting sharply with the triumphant exit of its football counterpart.

In football, the Pac-12 boasted three teams in the top 11 of the final rankings, showcasing its newfound competitiveness on the national stage. However, in basketball, the conference struggles to maintain a foothold, with only one team, Arizona, cracking the top 25 in the NET rankings as of February 29th. The absence of significant representation beyond Arizona underscores the widening gap between Pac-12 football and basketball.

As March Madness looms, attention turns to the tournament bubble, where teams like Colorado cling to hopes of securing a coveted spot. With data from four seasons of NET rankings indicating the importance of ranking position, Colorado faces a crucial stretch of games to bolster its tournament resume. Beyond Arizona, Washington State, and Colorado, the outlook appears bleak for Pac-12 teams in contention for meaningful March matchups.

In conclusion, while Pac-12 football bid farewell with a flourish, the basketball scene struggles to muster the same level of excitement and competitiveness. As the final days of Pac-12 basketball approach, the contrast with its football counterpart raises concerns over the conference’s future in the realm of collegiate athletics. Yet, as history has shown, March is a month of unpredictability, leaving room for surprises and upsets that could reshape the narrative of Pac-12 basketball’s farewell.